Paul Miles — Practice Build Plan (Phase 1 + Phase 2 Tools, Daily Routine, Knowledge Base Domains)
Tag: S-2026-03-17-paul-practice-build-plan
Type: own-writing
Author(s): Paul Miles (Red Strata)
Date of source: 2026-03-17
Date ingested: 2026-05-17
Authority weight: own-writing.
Raw file: Open Brain corpus snapshot at /_raw_sources/open-brain-2026-05-17-corpus.md.
What it claims
A bundled set of seven notes captured on 17 March 2026 setting out the build plan for Paul’s Governance & Assurance Specialist practice.
Phase 1 Priority Tools (universal, build first):
- Client Discovery Questionnaire (Word, 1–2 pages — universal across all four service lines).
- Data Governance Maturity Assessment Tool (Excel, 5-level scale × 8 dimensions: ownership, policy, quality, lineage, metadata, tooling, culture, operating model; scoring + heat map).
- AI Governance Maturity Assessment Tool (Excel, aligned to EU AI Act and SS1/23 / SR 11-7; dimensions: risk classification, model inventory, lifecycle controls, 1LoD/2LoD coverage, explainability, incident management).
- Governance Assurance Report Template (Word — executive summary, scope and methodology, findings register (risk-rated), recommendations, management response, appendices).
- Regulatory Requirements Mapping Template (Excel — BCBS 239 / EU AI Act / DORA → controls, evidence status, gap rating, remediation owner).
Phase 2 Tools (service-specific, after Phase 1):
- For Service Line — Governance Framework Design: governance design workshop facilitation guide; governance operating model design document; implementation roadmap template.
- For Service Line — Programme Governance Specialist: programme governance framework template; programme governance health check scorecard; programme reporting pack template.
- For Service Line — Regulatory Readiness and Evidence: BCBS 239 evidence pack; EU AI Act compliance evidence pack; DORA evidence pack; pre-examination briefing template.
- For client communication: engagement letter template; status report template; engagement closure report template.
Daily Knowledge-Building Routine (15–20 minutes):
- Morning scan (10 min) — rotate through EBA, FCA, BIS, EU AI Office, LinkedIn / practitioner communities.
- Capture one insight (2 min) using the “REGULATORY INSIGHT [date]” template ending in service-line tags.
- Weekly synthesis note (20 min, Friday) — “This week in governance: 3 bullets on what moved, what’s new, what to watch.”
- Consistent tags:
#regulatory-intelligence,#market-intelligence,#AI-governance,#data-governance,#framework-development,#tool-development,#client-ready.
Five Knowledge Base Domains:
- Regulatory Intelligence — EU AI Act, BCBS 239, DORA, model risk governance (SR 11-7 / SS1/23), FCA / PRA AI guidance, EBA internal governance.
- (Implicit — service lines + tools, covered in Phase 1 / Phase 2 above).
- Assessment & Diagnostic Tools — data governance maturity, AI governance maturity, regulatory readiness gap analysis, programme governance health check.
- Regulatory Evidence & Assurance Packs — BCBS 239 / EU AI Act / DORA evidence templates; assurance report template; second-line review templates; board and ExCo reporting.
- Market & Competitive Intelligence — regulatory pipeline; Big 4 positioning; CDO / CRO pain points; emerging topics (agentic AI governance, GenAI risk, data mesh governance, ESG data governance).
Four-week build plan.
- Week 1 Foundation: start daily capture; build Client Discovery Questionnaire; draft AI Governance Maturity Assessment.
- Week 2 Core Tools: Data Governance Maturity Tool; complete AI Governance Maturity Tool; Governance Assurance Report.
- Week 3 Regulatory Readiness: Regulatory Requirements Mapping; BCBS 239 evidence pack structure; EU AI Act compliance checklist.
- Week 4 Programme Governance: Programme Governance Framework; Health Check Scorecard; Phase 1 tool review.
- Ongoing: daily capture; weekly synthesis; 5 names/week from network to activate.
Notable quotes
- “Consistency over completeness — even one capture a day adds up to 250+ insights per year” — Paul, daily routine note.
What’s speculative vs. asserted
- Asserted (as plan): the full Phase 1 / Phase 2 tool list, the daily routine, the five domains, the four-week sequence.
- Speculative (as completion): as of last capture (10 May 2026), the corpus does not record which Phase 1 or Phase 2 tools have actually been completed. The daily routine is clearly being executed (the corpus itself is the evidence).
Topics this feeds
- Practice Build — Phase 1 and Phase 2 Tools
- Independent Specialist Positioning
- All four Service Line pages.
Open questions raised
- Build status of each Phase 1 and Phase 2 tool — corpus does not record completion against the four-week plan.
Ingestion note
Consolidates seven Open Brain task-type thoughts dated 17 March 2026 covering: Phase 1 priority tools; Phase 2 service-specific tools; daily routine; knowledge base domains 1, 3, 4, 5; four-week priority task list. Plus three duplicate thoughts of the same “develop a plan” action.