ISO Standards Wiki Section — Approach & Work Breakdown

Tag: S-2026-08-17-iso-standards-wiki-section Type: own-writing Author(s): Paul Miles with Claude (Cowork session, 17 Aug 2026) Date of source: 2026-08-17 Date ingested: 2026-08-17 Authority weight: high — first-party record of decisions taken and structure built in-session, confirmed by Paul Raw file: S-2026-08-17-iso-standards-wiki-section.md (working copy: _ClaudeWorkspace\12 ISO 42001 Lead Auditor\ISO-Standards-Wiki-Section-Approach-and-WBS-2026-08-17.md)

What it claims

Records the creation of the ISO Standards section of the wiki on 2026-08-17. Structure (“Hub + full study page”, confirmed by Paul): every standard = raw licensed PDF in _raw_sources/ (read-only, S-tag named) + a Source page + a study Topic page with clause map, study weights, terminology traps and an “Exam & audit relevance” subsection; a single shared hub, Map: ISO Standards, lists ingested and awaited standards and the consumption order (Map → Topic → Source → raw PDF, preserving two-click traceability). A repeatable 11-step per-standard ingest runbook is defined for future agents. Supporting decisions: #domain/ai-standards added to the tag taxonomy; no new page types invented; the map created below the §2.7 8-topic trigger at Paul’s explicit request; copyright respected by summarising rather than reproducing. First standard ingested under the structure: ISO/IEC 22989:2022. Known gaps: six pathway standards not yet ingested; open-questions.md not refreshed this session; 22989 Amendment 1 (Generative AI, in draft) to be ingested when published.

Notable quotes

  • “Consumption order: Map → Topic page (study) → Source page (what the text claims) → raw PDF (clause-level wording).”
  • “Every claim ends in an S-tag… never ad-hoc tags… Open Brain is append-only.”

What’s speculative vs. asserted

  • Asserted: the structure, decisions, delivered file list and runbook (all executed in-session and verifiable in the vault).
  • Speculative: none — the document records completed work; future-facing items are listed as open items, not claims.

Topics this feeds

Open questions raised

  • Whether the remaining six pathway standards are already secured (ties to project open question 6).
  • When to ingest 22989 Amendment 1 (Generative AI) — on publication, as an updating source.